“For sixty years the U.S. Supreme Court avoided trekking through the constitutional minefield accumulated around the long standing practice of police stopping and temporarily seizing people at ‘civil’ traffic stops.”

It’s a nice day and you are traveling down the road in your automobile listening to one of your favorite tunes playing on your car stereo when, a frenzied display of psychotropic red and blue pulsating lights appear suddenly in your rearview mirror. It’s a traffic cop! Like a warring bird of prey, he has swooped down upon you at lightning speed from out of nowhere and now he has you hopelessly locked firmly in his clutches.

Millions of Americans each year, traveling upon our nation’s highways and streets, share in a similar unpleasant experience of getting a traffic ticket. In most states, minor traffic offenses are legally classified as infractions. Infractions are considered legally to be ‘petty offenses’ of the law and not a crime. The commission of an infraction is classified as a non-criminal act and, therefore, the infraction is a ‘civil’ breach of the law.

There is little civil about the experience of being chased down like a common criminal by an armed police officer and handed a civil traffic ticket. Most people find the experience to be very unnerving, if not downright frightening. The civil traffic stop is made infinitely more tyrannous in light of the fact that the victim of the cop’s assault committed no crime.

The Fourth Amendment was designed to protect us against unreasonable search and seizures, requiring police to first have probable cause. Although probable cause was not defined by the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Court has long held that probable cause must include a criminal act to warrant seizure, or arrest. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) the U.S. Supreme Court held that police may briefly detain a person if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime.

Being that the Supreme Court’s litmus test for probable cause has historically required the element of a crime to be associate with reasonable cause for a seizure, how then is it possible that a traffic stop (seizure) for a non criminal civil infraction not to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment?

In 1967, the Supreme Court cracked open the door to provide legal sanction to what police officers were already doing around the country in violating the Fourth Amendment (performing traffic stop seizures for non-criminal civil infractions). In Delaware v. Prouse, 440, U.S. 648 (1967) the Supreme Court ruled, “The permissibility of a particular law enforcement practice is judged by balancing its intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests.” [writer emphases added]

For over sixty years the U.S. Supreme Court avoided trekking through the constitutional minefield accumulated around the long standing practice of police stopping and temporarily seizing people at ‘civil’ traffic stops. Civil traffic stops (seizures) were unquestionably at odds with people’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable seizures. The Supreme Court’s refusal to take the lead on the constitutional issue of the civil traffic stop left the state courts twisting in the wind of tyrannous constitutional construction and clamoring for a clear constitutional path they could take to safely traverse around the Fourth Amendment roadblock regarding the civil traffic stop and seizure.

The state courts have long and desperately sought the U.S. Supreme Court’s assistance in constitutionally ‘legitimizing’ (tweaking the Constitution) the six decade practice by police officers of seizing people for civil traffic offenses. The state courts had no way of neatly disposing of the highly problematic constitutional requirement that the U.S. Supreme Court had saddled them with. The U.S. Supreme Court had ruled that probable cause for a temporary seizure required a crime and the civil traffic stop was not a crime.

In 1996 the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 addressed head on the question of whether or not the civil traffic stop (seizure) violates a person’s Fourth Amendment rights. Acquiescing to the state courts’ demands, the Court provided the state courts with exactly what they had long sought, ruling; “As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred.” [writer emphases added]

Politicians are well known for their talent to spin things. ‘Spinning’ is the ability to make things appear to be something that they are not. However, this talent is not limited only to politicians. Supreme Court justices are also very practiced in the art of spinning. Justices of the Supreme Court are lawyers, and lawyers practice a form of spinning known as ‘legal word art’. This form of spinning is created by transforming common words into technical legal jargon with hidden meanings.

The Supreme Court in the Whren case applied a hefty dose of good ol’ spin doctoring, as the politicians like to say, to make it appear as if the civil traffic stop was not an assault on our Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable seizure. The Court in Whren capitalized on the use of one tiny, common, ordinary word – a word everyone uses and believes that they know the meaning of – ‘traffic.’

Traffic; the flow of vehicles and pedestrians along public right of ways. True? Yes, quite true when the word traffic is used in its ordinary sense, but not true when the word traffic is used in its legal sense. The word traffic used in its legal sense means an activity involving commerce — transportation of goods and people for profit as revealed in the following definition for the word ‘commerce’ under U.S. Code, Title 42, 21, VI, § 2000e (g). The term “commerce” means trade, traffic, commerce, transportation, transmission…” [writer emphases added]

A little more than a century ago, America had less tyrannous courts. The following 1898 Illinois Supreme Court ruling regarding the licensing of motorized methods of private transport of people not engaged in traffic is great proof of how at least one state supreme court followed the Constitution back then.

“The license is designed to operate upon those who hold themselves out as common carriers, and a license may be exacted from such as a proper exercise of police power; but no reason exists why it should be applied to the owners of private vehicles, used for their individual use exclusively, in their own business, or for their own pleasure, as a means of locomotion.” City of Chicago v. Collins et al., Supreme Court of Illinois. 175 Ill. 445, 51 N.E. 907 (Oct. 24, 1898).

The Illinois Supreme Court in 1898 held firm to the constitutional fact that the states have the power to regulate, license, and tax only those persons engaged in the activity of commerce related to the transport of people and goods upon the public right of ways.

Technically, the Supreme Court did not assail our Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable seizure. Stopping and temporarily seizing a person engaged in traffic (an activity in commerce) does not per se violate their constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment. The constitution grants states the right to regulate profit making activities in commerce upon the public right of ways.

In a realest or truest sense, the Supreme Court walloped our Fourth Amendment rights smack between the eyes with Whren (which was the Court’s intention from the get go). The states had long been pressuring the Supreme Court for a ruling such as this. They desperately needed to justify sixty
plus years of doing what is not justifiable – their long practice of seizing people not in engaged in commerce at so called civil traffic stops.

Had Whren raised the issue about his not being engaged in commerce and a regulated activity, at the time of his trial, then in all likelihood the Supreme Court would have passed on hearing his case. The Court would have just waited patiently for another case to come along possessing the elements necessary to rule in the same manner as the Court had done in the Whren case.

Traffic boils down to money, power, and control. Traffic tickets are a multi-billion dollar bonanza for state and local governments. Profit making activities allows the government to regulate, license, and tax people under the constitution. The state traps people into traffic in much the same manner as it does regarding the Income Tax – the government just pretends that we all are engaged in a profit making activity.

The Supreme Court acted on the pretense that Whren was engaged in a profit making activity upon the public right of way and therefore, the state had the power to regulate his activity (driving or being in commerce). The police have the right to regulate traffic and, therefore, can constitutionally temporarily seize a person engaged in commerce to issue them a traffic ticket for a civil breach of the state’s driver’s license compact.

The state’s so called driver’s license compact is written for those engaged in commerce. However this fact is cleverly disguised and hidden from people by the lawyers who write the laws using the “spin doctoring” or ‘legal word art.’

Your possessing a driver’s license is not proof or evidence that you are engaged in traffic. You can have a driver’s license and your car can be registered and this does not prevent you from lawfully traveling in your private constitutionally unregulated capacity upon the public right of ways. It’s the activity of engaging in commerce that grants the states the right to regulate traffic and nothing in the Constitution grants the states the right to regulate the people’s right to travel. The right to travel is not and cannot be made a regulated activity. Therefore, the temporary seizure by a police officer at the time of a traffic stop is unquestionably unconstitutional.

TicketSlayer.com Slayer your Traffic Ticket with Ticket Slayer!

Contact Author: GregS@TicketSlayer.com

There are many different ways to get website visitors to your site. If you are not tracking your results, you will never know what is good website traffic and what is a waste of money. Even if you do primarily free advertising methods, you are investing your time and need to get the best return back for the amount of hours that you are spending.

One thing I found helpful to understand what good website traffic is, is to install the Google Analytics code on all of my web pages. This provides a tremendous amount of information about the visitors that are coming to your site.

For example, you know where a visitor comes to your site from, how long they spend on your site, how many pages they visit, and much, much, more.

This is extremely valuble for the following reasons.

You’ll see ads all over the Internet where you can buy 10,000 visitors for $30. Generally, these are not worth the $30 that you spend on them and here is why.

If you have Google analytics on your pages you will see that the average time that these type of visitors spend on your site is less than five seconds. Now that may not be true for every company like this, but you can do your own survey and see if this is even remotely resembling quality traffic or not.

On the flip side of that, traffic that comes from the search engines will spend anywhere from a minute to two minutes on your site if you’ve got a decent page for them to look at. The reason for this is you’re getting targeted traffic from the search engines and you’re getting non-targeted traffic from buying thousands of visitors.

You can see the same results in various other forms of traffic too. For example, traffic that comes from a well written article may spend two to three minutes on your site and visit more than one page. In that case, it is worth writing a good article and getting it onto some of the top article directories.

Other methods of advertising that do produce quality traffic include forum marketing, and social bookmarking a blog post. I know I can say this for a fact because I’ve seen firsthand the results for this traffic.

You need to find out what is good website traffic for your site. The quality of traffic is much more important than the quantity. Ultimately you are looking for positive responses from your visitors and a quality visitor will give you more of those.

The Website and blog traffic generation guide for anyone. This is a guide that will help any novice make money online if you know how to converse that traffic into money. You will also get a chance to download my secret Article Marketing Guide at the end so you too can learn how I am using Article Marketing to get free targeted traffic.

1. PPC and Google Adword. This is a very nice technique if you have an extra few hundreds to spend but you will surely make a lot more than you spend if the product is good enough and you do it right. Do not use this technique if you Do not have a lot of money.

2. Squidoo. How could you not be using Squidoo as an affiliate?. If you do a search on Google for many keywords, you will find that Squidoo is ranked number very high.

3. USFreeAds. This is a very good method because it is super cheap to use, yet it is highly ranked in Search Engine for many Google keywords. Start using USfreeads if you have not because you’ll make a lot of money from it in the long run if used wisely.

4. Article Marketing. Many have used Article Marketing to make easy money online because it is free to implement. You can write a huge amount of articles and submit them to top Article Directories with your affiliate link at the end or your website link at the end. Buy a domain if you are promoting an affiliate product.

5. Youtube. If you create a video that is optimized to rank for a certain keyword and it gets popular then that video will probably appear on the first page of Google if you do a search for that specific keyword.

6. Craigslist. Craigslist is not too bad either because it does get billionaires of Page Views per month. Promote products wisely on Craigslist and you can get a few sales a day depending on the product..

7. Social Networking. Sites like Myspace can be used to promote affiliate product also but you need to find the right people which is easy if you are social.

8. Clipmarks. Clipmarks is a site that allows you to share anything that you think is interesting to others. Clipmark rank very high on Google and is very popular right now.

9. Blogging. Blogging is growing really fast and you should start using it to get organic traffic and make money. You will rank high on Google if your blog get popular and is optimized.

10. Squeeze Website. You could just set up your own website and optimize it for that product you want to promote. It will rank high if you are knowledgeable in SEO. You could do a review of that product in your website.

Click here: Bum Marketing Method to grab a free copy of “Make $200 a Day With Bum Marketing” at my money making ideas blog to learn how I am using Article Marketing to get free traffic.

You will learn:

-The best Article Directory you should submit your articles to.

-The one site you should submit your article to first BEFORE submit anywhere else.

-How to create 21 unique articles in less than 1 hour.

-How to make the most out of article marketing! And a LOT MORE!

Click here: Bum Marketing Method to grab a free copy of “Make $200 a Day With Bum Marketing.”